Lucas & Matt Veggie Soup

Dice all ingredients (small 5-8mm chunks) and dump into an 8+ quart pressure cooker pot.  Barley needs the most time, so start it immediately and then prep the veggies. Add just enough water to keep ingredients covered. Set the pot over medium heat and add:

  • 1 Matt handful and 3 Lucas handfuls of barley (~1/2 c.)
  • 5 bullion cubes (beef, chicken, whatever)
  • 1 parsnip
  • 1 bunch (6) of colored carrots
  • 4 stalks celery
  • 1/2 head of cabbage
  • 1 zucchini
  • 1 summer squash
  • 4 hot dogs
  • 1 Tbsp. of dried basil (or 4 fresh)
  • enough water to cover

Pressure cook for 5 minutes. Cool immediately and serve.

 

Open Source = more secure?

One of the many arguments Open Source advocates make is is that OSS is more secure because “anyone and everyone” can review the source.  This critical crypo bug in the GnuTLS library takes that idea out back and shoots it. Execution style.

(I’m not being critical of OSS. After all, I’m an OSS author and contribute to quite a few OSS projects. There are plenty of compelling arguments for OSS software, but increased security isn’t one of them.)

Pencil Sharpeners

While volunteering in my son’s classroom, his teacher asked if I’d sharpen some pencils, “Having a supply of sharp pencils is the bane of my existence!” I grabbed her basket of pencils and headed to the sharpening station, in a shared resource room. There I found this lovely little X-Acto XLR 1818 Electric Pencil Sharpener.

X-Acto sharpener

I sharpened about 25 pencils before the unit overheated. After 30 minutes it still refused to work. After 45 minutes I was able to sharpen 20 more pencils before it overheated again. Frustrated, I decided to engineer a better solution.

Design considerations:

• manual sharpeners don’t overheat
• teachers might be upset if I removed the electric sharpener
• pencil shavings should be dealt with
• doesn’t require [much] more space than a 11×17″ box lid
• one-handed operation is desirable

The first step was to acquire some good pencil sharpeners. I read a bunch of Amazon reviews and ultimately found penciltalk.org where pencil sharpening nerds hang out and write about their passion for sharpeners. I whittled down my list to these four which I purchased:

• Classroom Friendly
• Classic Manual (Deli 0620)
• Stanley Bostitch MPS1BLK (Amazon)
• Westcott Axis iPoint Evolution Electric Heavy Duty (15509) Amazon

After the sharpeners arrived, I grabbed a sheet of graph paper and a ruler. I measured how much clearance each sharpener needed to avoid skinned knuckles. Then I produced this sketch.

Pencil Station

With a design in hand, I headed to the garage and found an 8’ piece of 1” thick shelving. Because MDF wouldn’t hold a dado joint, I  glued each edge and screwed in L-brackets on the 4 back  corners (not pictured). Then I added the angle brackets to stiffen up the front. The result is a sharpening station that’s very heavy and stable.

Pencil Station

All three manual sharpeners came with a round L bracket designed to mount on the edge of a tabletop. I wanted a more secure attachment and the slippery shelf surface didn’t help. The solution was to add a layer of non-slip padding between the sharpener and shelf. Combined with the included bracket, the sharpeners have remained firmly attached for half a school year.

To keep the automatic sharpeners from sliding when pressing a pencil into them, I applied a pad of industrial strength Velcro hooks to the bottom shelf and hook-and-loop pads to the electric sharpeners. Now they too remain firmly in place while sharpening.

I am now experienced in bulk pencil sharpening. Every pencil in that basket is very sharp. I’m a fan of the Wescott and Classroom Friendly sharpeners. The fastest technique I’ve found is to load the Classroom Friendly, which grips the pencil and allows one-handed sharpening. I sharpen that pencil with my right hand, and sharpen another in the Westcott with my left. Both sharpeners are fast and good. I can settle into a rhythm where I’m cranking out two sharp pencils every 10 seconds.

I can see no evidence of anyone using the X-Acto any more. The Bostich is a piece of junk. It will only sharpen perfect pencils, it doesn’t produce a great point, and emptying the shavings is much harder than the Classroom Friendly and electric sharpeners.

What do the teachers think?

Hi Matt,

When I spoke with our staff this morning about pencil sharpeners, their eyes lit up! They would love to have one station per grade level (two for kindergarten). The total would be ten, if possible.

Mike
—-
Mike VanOrden – Principal

Value of a Hijacked PC

I’ve recently been writing mail server software that detects whether the remote is a compromised PC sending spam (frequently the case) versus a legit mail server whose connection should be permitted. The quantity of hijacked PCs is staggering, which made this article all the more interesting:

http://krebsonsecurity.com/2012/10/the-scrap-value-of-a-hacked-pc-revisited/

The value of a hacked PC
The value of a hacked PC

Dropbox, and a little less love

In addition to being a big fan of Dropbox, I’m also a paying customer. I’ve recommended them and I still do. But that doesn’t quell my disappointment in their new Terms of Service which strip away the rights to legal remedies (where they can still get away with that (most Red states)). Kudos to them for making it really easy to opt-out, but arbitration is so rarely a benefit to users (the company hires the arbitrators, so it’s the playing field isn’t level) that many parts of the world have outlawed the practice.

The value of belief: anti-vaccine body count

I’ve always been a believer. As a young man, I held very strong beliefs and I was seldom shy to tell you about them. Along life’s journey I erred and learned much from experience. In all my years, the single most valuable thing I’ve learned is that it doesn’t matter how strong something is believed, it only matters how correct the belief is.

The most critical of beliefs are those which, by definition, affect life and death. The Polio virus doesn’t care what you belief, only whether or not you and your loved ones were vaccinated. And yet here we are in the USA where vaccines are available to all, required of nearly all as schoolchildren, and yet 1,299 persons have died of vaccine preventable illnesses. Too many of them are children who are dead or mangled because their parents believed incorrectly. Please, example your beliefs, and don’t be one of those parents.

Nissan Leaf musings

In June of 2013, we leased a 2013 Nissan Leaf SV. It has since been our daily driver, making a 40 mile daily round-trip commute. It’s also the first car to leave the driveway on weekends. We like the car. A lot. It is fun to drive, spacious with 4 passengers, and fits 6 full shopping bags in the trunk. Our intent is to use all 12,000 miles per year allowed. After a few months driving, the fuel results are in.

  • electric bill: increased $30/mo.
  • gasoline: decreased by $100/mo.

Switching to electric resulted in an expense reduction of $70/mo. Our lease payment is $220/mo. If we reduce the lease payment by the fuel savings, our net payment is $150/mo. That’s a low payment for a $32,000 car.

Considering that 90% of our electricity here is renewable (hydro + wind), and electric cars are 90% efficient, and that ICE (internal combustion engines) are less than 30% efficient, the environmental impact of switching to electric is a big bonus.

The range is occasionally a limit. Lucas and I drove it to Meany Lodge. We’d have made the 75 mile trip except for the climb over Snoqualmie Pass. We had to stop at the pass and ‘juice up’ for a 1/2 hour, adding 10 miles of range. Then the Leaf nimbly climbed the forest service roads up to the lodge. We returned home with 25 miles to spare. Thousands of feet of elevation makes a meaningful difference in range.

It would be challenging if our only car was electric. We can’t pile 4 of us and luggage into the Leaf and drive to the Redwood Forests. Despite the Leaf’s great handling, the passes are just far enough away, uphill, in cold weather, that we’ll be taking the Fusion hybrid (37 mpg) on ski trips. For the 3% of our household driving that we don’t take the Leaf, range is the limiting factor.

Authoritative DNS servers, 2 or 3?

If you have some other rationale for [having a third DNS server], please feel free to elaborate.

The most basic reason for a 3rd DNS server is to increase availability. Every DNS primer advises having at least two DNS servers, geographically dispersed, and on different networks. Nearly every DNS operator starts out with two servers in the same rack, in the same subnet. Eventually, a failure will snowball and impact the many services above DNS, teaching the operator the value of isolation.

Even with 2 servers and appropriate geographic and network redundancy, eventually, a failure (fiber cut, power failure, server crash, etc.) will have 50% of your authoritative DNS offline for an extended period. During such failures, users will notice and complain. Within a day. In decades of experience, I’ve noticed that when the DNS server count is greater than two, a DNS server can be down for weeks before the first complaint arrives. Weeks.

Unless the operator has excellent monitoring tools (a small percentage), a DNS server failure can go unnoticed for hours or days. Some failures are subtle, such as zone file corruption that causes a single zone to not get published. The third server reduces outage impact from 50% to 33% of queries that fail.

For most operators, the more common reason for 3 servers is performance. By locating  DNS servers geographically closer to users, the round-trip-time of DNS lookups is reduced. This can also be achieved with 2 DNS servers and unicast IPs (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3258.txt). For the non-unicast enabled, having three or more DNS servers accomplishes that same purpose. Three seems to be the “sweet spot.”  If you survey the most popular sites, you’ll find they usually have 3 or more NS records.

My cadillac.net DNS cluster has one DNS server in Paris. That was by request of a French client. When all 3 servers were in the USA, their French web sites “felt” slower. We fixed that by moving one DNS server to Paris. Because DNS recursors remember how fast DNS servers respond, they tend to favor those nearest, resulting in better performance for end users. The difference is measurable with network tools, but more importantly, it’s perceptible to end users.

Another of my European clients has a significant portion of their user base in the USA. They have two DNS servers in Europe and 1 on each coast of the USA, so that DNS responses are fast for everyone. In 2010, they moved a couple of their more popular domains to a premium DNS provider for week long trial. They were unable to realize the promised increase in DNS performance or web traffic despite the premium $1,500/mo for the “Enterprise” DNS service. We believe that’s because we already had DNS servers geographically near the majority of their user base.

My clients in Australia prefer a couple DNS servers in the USA and one along the Pacific rim. For the same reason.

For most providers, the majority of their DNS traffic is local, covering less than 1,000km geographically. In those cases, the remainder may not be worth optimizing for. When it is, having a DNS server you can locate nearer your users can deliver substantial performance improvements.

Having three DNS servers, especially when each is in a different data center and different networks, identifies you as an experienced DNS operator that understands why you’d want number 3.